Scientific + Pedagogical Merit Review
All animal-based teaching and training activities, including credit courses and professional development workshops offered by the University of Alberta, require the submission and approval of an Animal Use Protocol (AUP) by the Course Instructor.
Per CCAC guidelines, these applications must undergo a pedagogical merit review before being reviewed by an Animal Care and Use Committee. For ongoing courses, this review is required every four years or whenever the course content involving animals changes.
Scientific Merit Review
Research studies involving animals must first demonstrate scientific merit before they can be considered by the University of Alberta's Animal Care and Use Committees (ACUC). This process is managed by the Vice-President, Research and Innovation (VPRI) through the Research Ethics Office (REO).
Researchers will need to complete the PI Research Summary Template and suggest two potential experts in the field. While these experts may be consulted, the REO may also seek reviews from other external sources. Only after receiving two favorable scientific merit reviews will the application proceed to the ACUC for ethical review.
Forms
- UAlberta Scientific Merit Review Research Summary (for PI)
- UAlberta Scientific Merit Peer Review Form (for Reviewers)
The Scientific Merit Review process typically takes approximately 3 months to complete.
Pedagogical Merit Review
- As part of the AUP submission process, the Principal Investigator should complete the Pedagogical Merit Review of Live Animal Based Teaching or Training Form A
- This form should be uploaded to the AUP in the Documentation section (Section 17 4.0), along with the required Attachments per Form A (in Section 17 5.0)
- Course Syllabus highlighting the specific animal use
- Lab Manual (sections pertaining to animal use)
- Other relevant handouts or documents:
- If this is a course that involves competencies or skills required by a regulatory body (medical, veterinary, etc.) attach the document that outlines the requirement.
- If this is a credit course or part of an Academic Program, provide a summary of the Academic Program that this course fits into, along with the intended learning outcomes for the program, indicating how animal use is necessary to achieve program outcomes.
- If the Course Syllabus does not clearly outline the learning outcomes and goals of the course relating to animal use, attach a document describing them.
- Attach any prior student assessments or course or session evaluations that were done that provide feedback on the animal-based teaching/training.
- Any other relevant documents.
- Submitting the AUP in the online system will initiate the Pedagogical Merit Review Process.
- The Principal Investigator will be contacted (via email outside of the online ethics system) by the Pedagogical Merit Committee members for any questions related to the Form A/submission. If any changes are required the AUP will be sent back to the applicant to make changes in the online application system.
- Once the Pedagogical Merit Review process has been completed, the application will be forwarded to the ACUC to initiate the review process within the online ethics system.
Forms
- UAlberta Pedagogical Merit Review Process
- UAlberta Pedagogical Merit Review Form A (for PI)
- UAlberta Pedagogical Merit Review Form B (for Reviewers)
Considerations for Instructors
Instructors should design their course objectives, outcomes, lab plans, assignments, and assessment methods with these key principles:
- Clearly outline any learning objectives and outcomes that require the use of animals in the formal course plan.
- Ensure that assessment methods align with the desired outcomes and learning activities, especially when involving animals.
- Clearly describe any learning activities that involve live animals or animal-derived samples.
- If live animals are central to the learning objectives, activities, and assessments, this alignment supports the pedagogical merit of using animals in teaching or training.